1.
What does the headline leave out
this newsworthy fact about the incident?
|
|
The type of the train getting the accident
|
|
|
The cause of the incident
|
|
|
The time
of incident
|
|
|
The place of the incident
|
|
|
mismanagement
|
|
|
track safety
|
|
|
victims
|
|
|
material loss
|
|
|
It blames the government for the incident.
|
|
|
It praises
KAI Daop II for KAI's immediate action to secure the executive cars.
|
|
|
It objectively reports the details of the incident.
|
|
|
It praises
KAI Daop II for apologizing to the passangers for the incident.
|
|
|
The railway tracks
|
|
|
The train
|
|
|
The railway station
|
|
|
The town
|
|
|
had happened
|
|
|
occurred
|
|
|
were observed
|
|
|
were made
|
|
|
were reported
|
|
|
People in
general
|
|
|
Medical business people
|
|
|
Health insurance companies
|
|
|
Medical scientists
|
|
|
Pharmaceutical industries
|
|
|
Concerned with the discharge
|
|
|
Angry at the hospital's slow response
|
|
|
Supports the hospital's policy
|
|
|
Disappointed with the discharge
|
|
|
Mr. Voelker was afraid of getting contaminated by
the disease
|
|
|
the Voelkers could not take care of Mrs Voelker
|
|
|
the Voelkers got angry with the hospital
|
|
|
Mr.
Voelker is most concerned with the risk on the daughter's health
|
|
|
The risk on the family
|
|
|
The
onerous safety precautions to protect the family
|
|
|
The source person
|
|
|
The timing of the discharge
|
|
|
Mrs
Voelker shouldn't have been discharged from the hospital after testing
positive for Influenza.
|
|
|
Mr. Voulker could be concerned by his mother's
discharge from the hospital for testing Influenza.
|
|
|
The hospital wouldn't have discharged Mrs Voelker
for tesing positive for influenza.
|
|
|
Canbera hospital would have treated Mrs Voelker for
being positive with influenza.
|
Post a Comment
Post a Comment